Automated QA

Quality assurance without the admin drag

Move beyond manual sampling. Intoku turns your entire call archive into searchable evidence—giving supervisors a complete view of service quality while eliminating hours of manual QA admin.

Manual quality assurance is an operational bottleneck

QSF-aware assurance depends on good evidence, consistent review, and practical follow-up. In many services, that still means manual sampling, spreadsheet tracking, fragmented notes, and long sessions listening back through recordings.

Manual samples take time

Supervisors and admin teams often spend hours finding recordings, checking forms, preparing evidence, and tracking review activity.

Recordings are hard to interrogate

A call archive may contain useful evidence, but it is difficult to search by theme, phrase, escalation, call type, or service issue.

Patterns can stay hidden

Random samples support review, but they do not always surface recurring themes across the full recording estate.

Feedback gets delayed

When it takes too long to find and review calls, valuable coaching opportunities are often delayed or missed entirely.

Full recording analysis

Move from sampled review to searchable call intelligence

Sampling remains useful, but it should not be the only practical way to understand call quality. Intoku turns call recordings into searchable operational evidence so supervisors can find relevant interactions faster and review them with context.

intoku-logo

Built around assurance workflows

Intoku supports the evidence work around quality assurance: call review, coaching, escalation checks, service themes, and audit preparation. It helps teams organise what happened, where to look, and what needs human review.

Call review evidence
Operator feedback and coaching
Escalation and procedure adherence
Call review evidence
Operator feedback and coaching
Escalation and procedure adherence
Call review evidence
Operator feedback and coaching
Escalation and procedure adherence
Call review evidence
Operator feedback and coaching
Escalation and procedure adherence
Service quality themes
Continuous improvement
Audit preparation
Service quality themes
Continuous improvement
Audit preparation
Service quality themes
Continuous improvement
Audit preparation
Service quality themes
Continuous improvement
Audit preparation

Reduce the time spent finding, preparing, and checking evidence

The burden is often not the review decision itself. It is the admin around it: finding calls, checking what was said, preparing notes, linking activity to local assurance themes, and making the work traceable.
Search instead of manually scrubbing recordings
Find recurring themes across large call volumes
Prepare review notes for human validation
Keep review activity traceable
Planning tool

How much admin time does call review take today?

Use our QSF call review calculator to estimate the monthly time and cost involved in reviewing sampled control-centre calls. It gives teams a practical baseline before exploring how full recording analysis and searchable call evidence could reduce manual workload.

Open the calculator
Searchable evidence

Search your call recordings like operational evidence

Find the recordings that matter by searching across transcripts, phrases, call themes, escalation language, operator actions, and local quality indicators.

no response
fall reported
fire alarm
operator reassurance
escalated to responder
no response
fall reported
fire alarm
operator reassurance
escalated to responder
no response
fall reported
fire alarm
operator reassurance
escalated to responder
no response
fall reported
fire alarm
operator reassurance
escalated to responder
caller distressed
repeat contact
complaint language
procedure not followed
missed medication
caller distressed
repeat contact
complaint language
procedure not followed
missed medication
caller distressed
repeat contact
complaint language
procedure not followed
missed medication
caller distressed
repeat contact
complaint language
procedure not followed
missed medication

AI helps find the evidence. Humans stay accountable.

Intoku can transcribe, classify, summarise, and flag recordings for review. Supervisors and quality leads still validate evidence, approve findings, coach teams, escalate concerns, and decide what action is appropriate.

Monthly QA review

Give quality leads a faster way to prepare call-review evidence and spot the recordings that need attention.

Operator coaching

Find examples of good practice, missed steps, reassurance, escalation handling, and training opportunities.

Incident and complaint review

Search recordings and transcripts for relevant phrases, events, call paths, and handover points.

Commissioner evidence requests

Locate supporting call evidence more quickly when teams need to explain service activity and outcomes.

Theme-based improvement

Review calls around repeat contact, delayed escalation, distress, failed contact, or local quality priorities.

Audit preparation

Organise review activity and evidence in a way that supports QSF-aware service management.

Vulnerable caller safeguarding

Automatically flag calls with high distress or concerning interactions so supervisors can quickly review and ensure duty of care.

New starter onboarding

Easily locate and review calls handled by recent hires to provide targeted feedback, ensure procedural adherence, and support development.

Make call quality easier to evidence

If your team is spending too much time searching recordings, preparing evidence, or managing manual review processes, Intoku can help you build a more searchable, assurance-aware approach to quality assurance.

Book a demo